The European Educational Researcher

A Systematic Review of Research on ChatGPT in Higher Education

Izzet Dos 1 *
1 Independent Researcher* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
The European Educational Researcher, Online-First Articles, pp. 59-76
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 117 DOWNLOADS: 68 Publication date: 15 Jun 2025
ABSTRACT
This systematic review synthesizes research published between January 2023 and March 2025 on the integration of ChatGPT in higher education. Following PRISMA guidelines, a total of 20 peer-reviewed empirical studies were selected from Web of Science and Scopus databases. These studies represent diverse global contexts and methodological approaches, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs. The review identifies five key thematic categories: student perceptions, attitudes, perceived usefulness, acceptance, and user experience. The findings indicate that while students and educators largely view ChatGPT as a beneficial tool for enhancing learning efficiency, self-regulation, and academic productivity, concerns about overreliance, ethical ambiguity, content accuracy, and academic integrity persist. The review further shows that the educational impact of ChatGPT is shaped not only by the affordances of the technology but also by contextual factors such as institutional policies, instructor guidance, and students’ AI literacy. Implications for practice include the need for clear usage guidelines, AI literacy integration, and pedagogical redesigns that promote critical thinking and originality. Limitations of the review include language and database restrictions, as well as the emergent nature of the literature base. Future research should address longitudinal impacts, discipline-specific applications, and cross-cultural differences in AI use.
KEYWORDS
ChatGPT, Perceptions of ChatGPT, Trust in ChatGPT, Experience with ChatGPT
CITATION (APA)
Dos, I. (2025). A Systematic Review of Research on ChatGPT in Higher Education. The European Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.824
REFERENCES
  1. Abdalla, S. Z. S. (2025). Understanding ChatGPT adoption for data analytics learning: A UTAUT perspective among social science students in Oman. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101310
  2. Adams, D., Chuah, K. M., Devadason, E., & Azzis, M. S. A. (2024). From novice to navigator: Students’ academic help-seeking behaviour, readiness, and perceived usefulness of ChatGPT in learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12427-8
  3. Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Huamaní Jordan, O., López Roca, C., & Saavedra Tirado, K. (2024). Analysis of college students' attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: Effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z
  4. Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Vargas, C. G. A. P., Jordan, O. H., Ballesteros, M. A. A., & Morales, A. E. P. (2024). Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320
  5. Almogren, A. S., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Dahri, N. A. (2024). Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A smart education perspective. Heliyon, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31887
  6. Asy’ari, M., & Sharov, S. (2024). Transforming Education with ChatGPT: Advancing Personalized Learning, Accessibility, and Ethical AI Integration. International Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i2.2424
  7. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  8. Cao, Z. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of ChatGPT-4 in providing scientific references across diverse disciplines. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.09914
  9. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  10. Chen, S. Y., Kuo, H. Y., & Chang, S. H. (2024). Perceptions of ChatGPT in healthcare: Usefulness, trust, and risk. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1457131
  11. Chung, J., & Kwon, H. Y. (2025). Privacy fatigue and its effects on ChatGPT acceptance among undergraduate students: Is privacy dead? Education and Information Technologies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13198-6
  12. Dwivedi, Y. K., Sharma, A., Rana, N. P., Giannakis, M., Goel, P., & Dutot, V. (2023). Evolution of artificial intelligence research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research topics, trends, and future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  13. Espartinez, A. S. (2024). Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-Methodology study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100264
  14. Fuchs, K., & Aguilos, V. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: Empirical insights from students about using ChatGPT. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.9.1939
  15. Han, Z., & Battaglia, F. (2024). Transforming challenges into opportunities: Leveraging ChatGPT'slimitations for active learning and prompt engineering skill. The Innovation. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-med.2024.100065
  16. Heung, Y. M. E., & Chiu, T. K. (2025). How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361
  17. Jo, H. (2023). Understanding AI tool engagement: A study of ChatGPT usage and word-of-mouth among university students and office workers. Telematics and Informatics, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102067
  18. Jung, Y., Chen, C., Jang, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2024, May). Do We Trust ChatGPT as much as Google Search and Wikipedia?. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650862
  19. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103.
  20. Kayalı, B., Yavuz, M., Balat, Ş., & Çalışan, M. (2023). Investigation of student experiences with ChatGPT-supported online learning applications in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8915
  21. Kim, S. (2024). Harnessing AI for Writing Development: Exploring Emerging Multilinguals’ ChatGPT Usage Patterns (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
  22. Krause, S., Panchal, B. H., & Ubhe, N. (2024, July). The evolution of learning: Assessing the transformative impact of generative ai on higher education. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Technology (pp. 356-371). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  23. Oladokun, B. D., Enakrire, R. T., Emmanuel, A. K., Ajani, Y. A., & Adetayo, A. J. (2025). Hallucitation in Scientific Writing: Exploring Evidence from ChatGPT Versions 3.5 and 4o in Responses to Selected Questions in Librarianship. Journal of Web Librarianship, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2025.2482093
  24. Page, M. J., & Moher, D. (2017). Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Systematic reviews, 6, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
  25. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of applied learning and teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
  26. Šedlbauer, J., Činčera, J., Slavík, M., & Hartlová, A. (2024). Students' reflections on their experience with ChatGPT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12967
  27. Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x
  28. Shuhaiber, A., Kuhail, M. A., & Salman, S. (2025). ChatGPT in higher education—A student’s perspective. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100565
  29. Strzelecki, A. (2024). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive learning environments, 32(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
  30. Supianto, R., Widyaningrum, F., Wulandari, M., Zainudin, A., & Athiyallah yM, R. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting ChatGPT acceptance among university students. Multidiscip. Sci. J, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024273
  31. Urban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavský, J., Hrabalová, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 215, 105031. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9z2tc
  32. Wang, K. D., Burkholder, E., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., & Haber, N. (2024). Examining the potential and pitfalls of ChatGPT in science and engineering problem-solving. In Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1330486
  33. Xu, S., Su, Y., & Liu, K. (2024). Integrating AI for enhanced feedback in translation revision: A mixed-methods investigation of student engagement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08581. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.08581
  34. Žáková, K., Urbano, D., Cruz-Correia, R., Guzmán, J. L., & Matišák, J. (2024). Exploring student and teacher perspectives on ChatGPT’s impact in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13184-y
  35. Zhu, C. Z. G., Hall, C. M., Fong, L. H. N., Lin, F., & Naderi Koupaei, S. (2024). Examining the effects of ChatGPT on tourism and hospitality student responses through integrating technology acceptance model. International Journal of Tourism Research, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2727
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.