The European Educational Researcher

Character Building at Bachelor's Psychology Program: Findings Based on a Natural Approach

Sabita Soedamah-Muthu 1,
Ya Ping (Amy) Hsiao 2 *
1 Academic Director, Associate Professor, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands 2 Senior Assessment Specialist and Teacher Trainer (UTQ/ SUTQ) Teacher Development, Academic Services, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
The European Educational Researcher, Volume 6, Issue 2, June 2023, pp. 19-33
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 830 DOWNLOADS: 503 Publication date: 15 Jun 2023
ABSTRACT
Character building (CB) is a crucial aspect for basic psychologists who need to carry out their consultation tasks effectively. At Tilburg University, lecturers have the freedom to interpret the five CB dimensions and implement them in courses, including intellectual independence, critical mindset, social responsibility, scientific responsibility, and entrepreneurship. This study aims to investigate how the five CB dimensions are interpreted and implemented in the three-year Bachelor Psychology program at Tilburg University. As part of the regular quality assurance of assessment, we made a full program assessment plan in 2021-2022 and collected extra data on course practices of CB. At the program level, the five CB dimensions were related to the 13 program learning outcomes by reviewing the self-reflection report. At the course level, a template thematic analysis was used to code the course learning goals, instructional activities, and assessment. Two-thirds of the courses formulated CB-related learning goals, mostly delivered through interactive lecture forms. The instructional activities were categorized into six themes: academic standards, application, evaluative judgment, self-regulation, societal relevance, and taking initiatives. The five CB dimensions were mostly assessed by coursework method, but there was a lack of assessment of CB elements such as reflection. The five CB dimensions were implemented in most educational processes at the course and program level, despite the absence of a standardized implementation plan. We advise to focus on the assessment design for character education, particularly through the use of more authentic and performance-based assessment methods.
KEYWORDS
Character education, constructive alignment, course assessment design, instructional design, program curriculum design
CITATION (APA)
Soedamah-Muthu, S., & Hsiao, Y. P. (. (2023). Character Building at Bachelor's Psychology Program: Findings Based on a Natural Approach. The European Educational Researcher, 6(2), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.622
REFERENCES
  1. American Psychological Association. (2011). Principles for quality undergraduate education in psychology. http://www.apa.org/education/undergrad/
  2. American Psychological Association. (2016). Guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. American Psychologist, 71, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037562
  3. Berkowitz, M., & Bier, M. (2007). What works In character education. Journal of Research in Character Education, 5(1), 29-48.
  4. Berkowitz, M. W. (2022). Implementing and assessing evidence-based character education. Journal of Education, 202(2), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211026908
  5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
  6. Carr, D. (2017). Virtue and character in higher education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(1), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1224806
  7. de Regt, H., & van Lenning, A. (2017). Exploring an educational vision for Tilburg University. Tilburg University.
  8. Dunn, D. S., Brewer, C. L., Cautin, R. L., Gurung, R. A. R., Keith, K. D., McGregor, L. N., Nida, S. A., Puccio, P., & Voigt, M. J. (2010). The undergraduate psychology curriculum: Call for a core. In Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline. (pp. 47-61). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12063-003
  9. Halonen, J. S., Nolan, S. A., Frantz, S., Hoss, R. A., McCarthy, M. A., Pusateri, T., & Wickes, K. (2020). The challenge of assessing character: Measuring APA Goal 3 student learning outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 47(4), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320945119
  10. King, N. (2012). Doing template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 426-450). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526435620.n24
  11. Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Ten myths about character, virtue and virtue education – Plus three well-founded misgivings. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.778386
  12. Lamb, M., Dykhuis, E. M., Mendonça, S. E., & Jayawickreme, E. (2022). Commencing character: A case study of character development in college. Journal of Moral Education, 51(2), 238-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1953451
  13. Pike, M. A., Hart, P., Paul, S.-A. S., Lickona, T., & Clarke, P. (2021). Character development through the curriculum: Teaching and assessing the understanding and practice of virtue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 449-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1755996
  14. Schwartz, B. (2022). Science, scholarship, and intellectual virtues: A guide to what higher education should be like. Journal of Moral Education, 51(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1772211
  15. Shephard, K. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810842201
  16. Sokol, B. W., Hammond, S. I., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2010). The developmental contours of character. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing (pp. 579-603). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8675-4_33
  17. VanderWeele, T. J. (2022). The importance, opportunities, and challenges of empirically assessing character for the promotion of flourishing. Journal of Education, 202(2), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211026905
  18. Wright, J. C., Warren, M. T., & Snow, N. E. (2020). Understanding virtue: Theory and measurement. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190655136.001.0001
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.