The European Educational Researcher

The Role of the Capstone Project in Engineering Education in the Age of Industry 4.0 - A Case Study

Avihai Shurin 1 2,
Nitza Davidovitch 3,
Shraga Shoval 3
1 Ariel University2 Shamoon College of Engineering3 Ariel University
Download PDF
The European Educational Researcher, Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2021, pp. 63-84
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 996 DOWNLOADS: 429 Publication date: 15 Feb 2021
ABSTRACT
The capstone project in many academic institutions is the high point of undergraduate studies in engineering. The transition of graduates to industry is still not optimal, and there is a disparity between the needs of industry and the actual ability of academia to meet these needs. This study examines the role of the capstone project as a pedagogical tool in the age of Industry 4.0 in the field of product development, and as a bridge between academia and industry. The study combines qualitative and quantitative methods, focusing on four stakeholders (academia, industry, students and advisors). The study is based on several sources, such as: semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, observations, and more. The study results indicate that the capstone project is important and valuable for industry and academia, as well as being perceived by students as the most important undergraduate course. Nevertheless, the results reveal that it has many gaps and shortcomings and illuminate the need for a deep perceptual and structural change. Academia should reconsider projects' length and define milestones in which independent learning is optimally enabled. The projects' contribution to academic institution reputation, should be considered when defining the project goals. Coping with the challenges and gaps found in this study, the project can also be used in order to reduce incongruities, while preparing the students in a better way for their professional role in changing environment.
KEYWORDS
Academic-Industry relationship, Capstone projects [syn: Senior project], Engineering Education, Industry 4.0, Instructional methods [syn: Pedagogy], Professional skills [syn: Soft skills].
CITATION (APA)
Shurin, A., Davidovitch, N., & Shoval, S. (2021). The Role of the Capstone Project in Engineering Education in the Age of Industry 4.0 - A Case Study. The European Educational Researcher, 4(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.414
REFERENCES
  1. Akili, W. (2011). On implementation of problem-based learning in engineering education: Thoughts, strategies and working models. 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1, S3B-1-S3B-6. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142739
  2. Beckford, A. (2018, August 6). The skills you need to succeed in 2020. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellevate/2018/08/06/the-skills-you-need-to-succeed-in-2020/
  3. Bentur, A., Zonnenshain, A., Nave, R., and Dayan, Y. (2019). Haforum Lechinuch Mehandesim Bamea Ha 21: Tovanot, Darcey Peula, Veshinuy Paradigmot. [The Forum for Engineering Education in the 21st century: Paradigms, insights and implications to Israel]. Technion, Haifa: Samuel Neaman Institute. Retrieved from: https://www.neaman.org.il/Files/Engineering%20education_20190602171509.311.pdf
  4. Breiner, J., Harkness, S., Johnson, C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
  5. Council for Higher Education (CHE) (2018). Ma'apechat Limudey HaHandasa Ve HaHai Tech. [The revolution in engineering and high-tech studies]. Retrieved from: https://che.org.il/מהפכת-לימודי-ההנדסה-וההייטק/
  6. Council for Higher Education (CHE) (2019). Tafkidim VeSamchuyot [Roles and authorities]. Retrieved from: https://che.org.il/%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%9E%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA/
  7. Craig, K., & Voglewede, P. (2010). Multidisciplinary engineering systems graduate education: Master of Engineering in Mechatronics. 2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, 1-14. doi:10.11.09/TEE.2010.550.8819
  8. Davidovitch, N., & Shiller, Z. (2016). Skill-based teaching for undergraduate STEM majors. American Journal of Engineering Education, 7(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v7i1.9683
  9. Diwan, P. (2017). Is Education 4.0 an imperative for success of 4th industrial revolution? Retrieved from https://medium.com/@pdiwan/is-education-4-0-an-imperative-for-success-of-4th-industrial-revolution-50c31451e8a4
  10. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
  11. González, I., & Calderón, A. (2018). Development of final projects in engineering degrees around an Industry 4.0-oriented flexible manufacturing system: Preliminary outcomes and some initial considerations. Education Sciences, 8, 214. doi: 10.3390/educsci8040214
  12. Gray, A. (2016). The 10 skills you need to thrive in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-10-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/
  13. Heller-Hayun, O., Davidovitch, N., & Shoval, S. (2011). Meteoria Lemaase: Bchinat Hatamat Limudiem Shel Bogrey Machlaka Lehandasat Taasiya Venihul Letzorchey Avodatatm – Cheker Mikre [From theory to practice: How well do the IE & M studies fit the alumni job needs – a case study]. Industry oriented innovation in Academia. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Industry-Academia Conference. Israel.
  14. Hauhart, R. C., & Grahe, J. E. (2015). Designing and teaching undergraduate capstone courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Hotaling, N., Fasse, B., Bost, F., Hermann, C., & Forest, C. (2013). A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01122.x
  16. Howe, S., & Goldberg J. (2019). Engineering capstone design education: Current practices, emerging trends, and successful strategies. In D. Schaefer, G. Coates, & C. Eckert (Eds.), Design education today (pp. 115-148). Springer, Cham.
  17. Kanmani, B., & Babu, K. (2015). Introducing ‘life-long learning’ in engineering education. 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on MOOCs. Innovation and Technology in Education, 466-471. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7375366
  18. Lanter, D., & Essinger, R. (2017). User centered design. In The International Encyclopedia of Geography (pp. 1-4). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0432
  19. Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design Studies, 32(5), 417-430. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003
  20. Moon-Soo, K. (2015). A comparative review on problem- & project-based learning and applied method for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 18(2), 65- 76. doi: 10.18108/jeer.2015.18.2.65
  21. Munakata, M., & Vaidya, A. (2015). Using project- and theme-based learning to encourage creativity in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(2), 48-53. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095180
  22. Núñez, C., Guinea, A., Callau, S., Bengoa, C., Basco, J., & Gavalda, J. (2017). How the contents of a bachelor's degree final project of engineering evolve towards innovative scientific knowledge: Keys to success. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(2), 241-253. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.256
  23. Saar, Y. (2011, September 1). Bogrey Beit Sefer Leitzuv Magieim Lekav Hasyum Im Halashon Bahutz. Haem Ze Adain Echrechy? [Design school graduates arrive at the finishing line exhausted. Is it still essential?] Ha’aretz. Retrieved from: https://www.haaretz.co.il/misc/1.1210816
  24. Sadeh, Y. (2010). Itzuv Taasiyati Effectivi – Metoda. [Effective industrial design by IDM – Industrial Design Method]. Kol Hama’arachot (6th ed., pp. 27-40). Retrieved from: https://incoseil.org/htmlPages/kol_june10/
  25. Shacham, S. & Davidovitch, N. (2010). Ha'Akademia Vehasade. Cheker Mikre – Limudey Haandasa Bamercaz Haoniersitay Ariel. [Academe and the field. Case study – engineering studies at the Ariel University Center. Israel.
  26. Shamoon College of Engineering. (2018). Self-evaluation report - Department of mechanical engineering. Israel.
  27. Shurin, A., Davidovitch, N. & Shoval, S. (2019). Zrachey Proyect Hagmar Betchum Pituach Hamutzarim Hafizim, El Mul Etgarey Ha'Atid. [The needs of the capstone project in the field of product development (durable goods) versus the challenges of the future]. In: E. Menipaz, Y. Bukchin, S. Dror, A. Cohen, Y. Baron, & A. Korman (Eds.), Innovativeness, entrepreneurship, and global competitiveness in the digital era (pp. 56-57). 21st National Conference for Engineering, Industry, and management, Israel.
  28. Soares, F. O., Sepúlveda, M. J., Monteiro, S., Lima, R. M., & Dinis-Carvalho, J. (2013). An integrated project of entrepreneurship and innovation in engineering education. Mechatronics, 23(8), 987-996. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55626838.pdf
  29. Todd, R., Sorensen, C., & Magleby, S. (1993). Designing a senior capstone course to satisfy industrial customers. Journal of Engineering Education (JEE), 82(2), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1993.tb00082.x
  30. Umachandran, K., Corte, V. D., Amuthalakshm, P., Ferdinand-James, D., Said, M. M. T., Sawicka, B., & Jurcic, I. (2019). Designing learning-skills towards Industry 4.0. World Journal on Educational Technology, 11(2), 12-23. doi: 10.18844/wjet.v11i2.4147
  31. World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs. Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf
  32. Zaher. A., & Damaj. I (2018). Extending STEM education to engineering programs at the undergraduate college level. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEG), 8(3). 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v8i3.8402
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.