All posts by: technovision

About technovision

Distributed Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database (1981-2020)

García-Carreño, I.V.

University Pablo Olavide, Spain

Download: FULL TEXT PDF
Download: 25, size: 0, date: 15.Jun.2021

Abstract: Distributed Leadership is a conceptual and analytical approach to understanding leadership that is focused on interactions between leaders and those they lead with the goal of driving instructional improvement and improving student outcomes by developing high-quality teaching and an educational culture that enables all students to thrive. This article provides an overview of the state-of-the-art research available on distributed leadership. As new social and educational demands emerge, leadership responses need to be reformed at all school levels to ensure a school’s ability to provide a high-quality education. These transformations must be promoted from within each school center. The author describes and covers a deep review of the literature between 1981 and 2020. The source data for this research, (321articles), is derived from SCOPUS, Biblometrix Studio, and VOSviewer. The terms and their clusters were illustrated on graphs, and density maps were utilized. General recommendations are provided and challenges are identified for the incorporation of DL changes into the management of schools. The findings show that the literature refers explicitly to DL, wherein there are a number of interesting insights provided by theoretical articles. A conclusion is givenwith recommendations for further multidisciplinary research at the intersection of the fields in order to show the holistic landscape of this field.

Keywords:  Bibliometric review; Bibliometrix analyzes R; Co-authorship; Distributed leadership; Keywords analyses; Science mapping; VOSviewer.

Please Cite: García-Carreño, I., V. (2021). Distributed Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database (1981-2020).  The European Educational Researcher, 2(6), 227-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.426

References

Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2018). Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis, European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE), 24(1), 42-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.004

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: A R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

Barnard, C. (1968). The functions of the executive. Harvard UniversityPress.

Beck, A. P., & Peters, L. (1981). The research evidence for distributed leadership in therapy groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy31(1), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.1981.11492045

Becker, H., & Useem, R. H. (1942). Sociological analysis of the dyad. American Sociological Review, 7(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086253

Benne, K. & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members, Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1948.tb01783.x

Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. & Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed Leadership. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.

Beaudry, C., & Lariviere, V. (2016). Which gender-gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine. Research Policy, 45(9), 1790–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.009

Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research, International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x

Bradford, S. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000407

Brown, M., & Hosking, D. (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations39(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001872678603900104

Camburn, E., Rowan, B. & Taylor, J. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: the case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25(4), 347-373. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F01623737025004347

Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525

Dahl, R. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

De la Cruz del Río-Rama, M., Maldonado-Erazo, C., Álvarez-García, J., & Durán-Sánchez, A (2020). Cultural and natural resources in tourism Island: Bibliometric mapping. Sustainability 12(2), 724-744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020724

Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package, Journal of Scientometric Res, 8(3), 156-160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamaki, R.L. (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, (pp. 19–38) y. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003

Etzioni, A. (1965). Dual leadership in complex organizations, American Sociological Review, 30(2), 688-698.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2091137

Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social Pressure in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing, Harper, New York.

Follett, M. (1942/2003). Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, Routledge, London.

French, J., & Snyder, R. (1959). Leadership and interpersonal power. In: D.  Cartwright (Ed.) Studies in Social Power. (pp. 118-149). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

García, I. (2020). e-Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC) 13(1), 19-34 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v13i1.12341

Gibb, C. (1954). Leadership (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

González-Álvarez, J., & Cervera-Crespo, T. (2017). Research production in high-impact journals of contemporary neuroscience: A gender analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.12.007

Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis, Leadership Quarterly 13(4), 423-451. http://doi:org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)

Gronn, P. (2003). The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform, Paul Chapman, London.

Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership, Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863235

Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M., Gümüş, E., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: a bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1578737

Hallinger, P. & Kantamara, P. (2013). Leading at the confluence of tradition and globalisation: the challenge of change in Thai schools. Asia Pacific journal of education, 20(2), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2000.10600182

Hallinger, P., & Suriyankietkaew, S. (2018). Science Mapping of the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Leadership, 1990–2018. Sustainability, 10(12), 4846-4866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846

Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401- 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401

Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2021). Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: A longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143219859002

Hallinger, P., & Vien-Thong, N (2020). Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review, Sustainability, 12(5), 1947-1953, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947

Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801

Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863253

Harris A. (2009). Distributed Leadership: What We Know. In: Harris A. (eds) Distributed Leadership. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, The Nederlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_2

Harris, A., & DeFlaminis, J. (2016). Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, 30(4), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616656734

Harris, A., & Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863235

Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9048-4

Harzing, A., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659-689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042

Heinicke, C., & Bales, R. F. (1953). Developmental trends in the structure of small groups. Sociometry, 16(1), 7-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785953

Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Apolo-Masache, B., & Jaya-Montalvo, M. (2020). Research Trends in Geotourism: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Scopus Database. Geosciences, 10(10), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100379

Hoogendoorn, G. (2008). Scopus: The continuing development of an abstract and citation database. The Serials Librarian, 55(1-2), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801970899

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Katz, D. & Kahn, R. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations, Social Forces, 57(4), 1413–1415, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/57.4.1413

Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. (1978). Substitutes  for  leadership: Their  meaning  and  measurement, Organizational  Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 375-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5

Louis, K., & Marks, H. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American journal of education, 106(4), 532-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/444197

Mao, G., Huang, N., Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2017). Research on biomass energy and environment from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol, 51(13), 7599-7605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.173

Manz, C., & Sims, H. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585-600. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306232

Mehra, A., Smith, B., Dixon, A., & Robert-son, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly 17(3), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003

Moed, H., & Glänzel, W. (2005). Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures. Current Science, 89(12), 1990-1996. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24111059

Mohamed, A., Abdul Razak, A., & Abdullah, Z. (2020). Most-Cited Research Publications on Educational Leadership and Management: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 4(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/1186/2046-4053-4-1

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., & Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Western Michigan University: Sage.

Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers. Chandos Publishig.Cambridge, MA, United States.

Samul, J. (2020). The Research Topics of Leadership: Bibliometric Analysis from 1923 to 2019. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(2), 116-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.5036

Schein, E. (1988). Organizational Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Scopus (2020). Content Coverage Guide, Elsevier: Amsterdam.

Segura-Robles, A., Parra-González, M. E., & Gallardo-Vigil, M. (2020). Bibliometric and Collaborative Network Analysis on Active Methodologies in Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 259-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.575

Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping, International Marketing Review, 33(3),327-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341

Spillane, J. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum 69(2), 143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678

Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2001). Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective. Educational Researcher30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023

Spillane, J., Halverson, R. & Diamond, J. (2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of curriculum studies, 31(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726

Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038545

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review Introduction: The need for an evidence- informed approach. Br. J. Manag, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Todeschini, R., & Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969

Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly Review of Leadership, 17(6), 654–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007

van Dinter, R., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2021). Automation of Systematic Literature Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, 136(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589

van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285-320). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2019). Manual for VOSviewer. University of Leiden, The Nederland.

VOSviewer. (2020). https://www.vosviewer.com/

Waltman L., & van Eck N. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12). 2378– 2392. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22748

Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

 

 

Vol. 4 Iss. 2

Levels of Ethnocentricism Among Teachers of Turkish as a Foreign Language

Mehmet Emre ÇELİK & Latif İLTAR

Download: FULL TEXT PDF
Download: 28, size: 0, date: 15.Jun.2021

Abstract: In this study, in which the levels of ethnocentrism of those who teach Turkish as a foreign language were examined in line with various variables, the general survey model within the scope of descriptive research was implemented. The research was carried out with 185 instructors who teach Turkish as a foreign language in various state or private institutions in the 2020-2021 academic year. In order to assess the ethnocentrism level of teachers, a 5-item Likert-type Ethnocentrism Scale, comprised of 20 questions, developed by Neuliep and McCroskey (1997) and which was later adapted to Turkish by Üstün (2011) was used. In the study, it was found that the levels of ethnocentrism of those who teach Turkish as a foreign language differ significantly according to such variables as gender, age, their holding a Turkish teaching certificate for foreigners and to the MA program they graduated from, yet it was also concluded that there was no significant difference according to the other variables as the institution they work for, the department they studied in, whether they know a foreign language, where they teach Turkish, and their intercultural communication competence.

Keywords: Etnocentricism; Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language; Intercultural Communication Competence.

Please Cite: Celik, M.E., Iltar, L.(2021). Levels of Ethnocentricism Among Teachers of Turkish as a Foreign Language. The European Educational Researcher,4(2), 251-266.DOI: https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.427

References

Bennett, M. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations10(2), 179-196.

Bennett, M. J. (1998). Intercultural communication: A current perspective.  Milton J. Bennett (Ed.), In Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Selected readings (pp. 1-34). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press

Bhawuk, D. P. S.,  Richard, B. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 16. 413-436

Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (1997). A review of the concept of intercultural sensitivity. Human Communication, 1, 1-16.

Chen, G. M. (2010). The impact of intercultural sensitivity on ethnocentrism and intercultural communication apprehension. Intercultural Communication Studies, XIX(1), 1-9.

Douglas S., R. & Rosvold M. (2018). Intercultural communicative competence and english for academic purposes:a synthesis review of the scholarly literatüre. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 21 (1), 23-42.

Eğinli, A., T. (2011). Kültürlerarası yeterliliğin kazanılmasında kültürel farklılık eğitimlerinin önemi [The importance of cultural diversity education in gaining intercultural competence]. Öneri Dergisi. 35. 215-227.

Goldstein, S. B. & Kim, R. I. (2006) Predictors of US college students’ participation instudy abroad programs: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 30. 507–521

Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: the intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 27. 421-443.

İçli, G. (2015). Sosyolojiye giriş [Introduction to sociology]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Karasar, N. (2007). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Neuliep, J. W. & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of a U.S. and generalized ethnocentrism scale. Communication Research Reports. 14 (4), 385-398.

Neuliep, J. W., Chaudoir, M. & McCroskey J. C. (2001) A cross‐cultural comparison of ethnocentrism among Japanese and United States college students. Communication Research Reports, 18 (2), 137-146,

Özkan, H. (2018). English language instructors’ perceptions of intercultural communicativ competence in a multicultural context: a suggested model. Doktora Tezi [Doctoral thesis]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.

Özyurt, C. (2020). Eğitim sosyolojisi yazıları [Educational sociology articles]. Ankara: PEGEM.

Saygılı, D. ve Kana, F. (2018). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğreten öğretmenlerin kültürlerarası duyarlılığı [Intercultural sensitivity of teachers teaching Turkish as a foreign language]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(4), 1041-1063

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (sixth ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Üstün, E. (2011). Öğretmen Adaylarının Kültürlerarası Duyarlılık ve Etnikmerkezcilik Düzeylerini Etkileyen Etmenler [The Factors Affecting the Intercultural Sensitivity and Ethniccentrism Levels of Teacher Candidates]. Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Master Thesis]. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

Yılmaz, G. ve Tepe, N. (2020). Yurt dışında görev yapan okutmanların kültürlerarası iletişim algılarının incelenmesi: Nitel bir araştırma [Examining the intercultural communication perceptions of lecturers working abroad: A qualitative study]. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 9(4), 1616-1633.
Vol. 4 Iss. 2

Elementary School Teachers’ Views Scale on the Using Zoom in Compulsory Distance Education During the Pandemic: Psychometric Properties

Ceyhun Memiş

Download: FULL TEXT PDF
Download: 52, size: 0, date: 02.Jun.2021

Abstract: Just as important phenomena such as natural disasters, conflicts and pandemics have effects on people’s lives, new technologies also have impacts on people’s lives and lifestyles. As a part of COVID-19, many countries have been forced to practice distance education at almost all educational levels. The pandemic of COVID-19 inspired educators to schedule for online learning.
To help students learn, educators have used a range of online synchronous meeting technologies (SMTs). Zoom is a widely used, immersive, and easy-to-use SMT. In order to integrate Zoom application effectively which has started to be used in many countries and at all levels of education, it is essential to determine the teachers’ thoughts and attitudes about using Zoom in the distance education process. To assess teachers’ views, a valid and reliable measuring tool is needed. This research sought to create a valid and reliable scale that would assess teachers’ views on the use of Zoom in distance education based on this need. The scale validity and reliability analysis have used for content validity, EFA, CFA, Cronbach alpha, and Composite reliability. According to the study’s findings the scale is valid and reliable. Future researchers will be able to apply the developed scale in our study, to teachers working at various educational levels. Furthermore, the scale can be adapted for teachers serving in a variety of countries and cultures.

Keywords: Compulsory Distance Education; COVID 19; Elementary School Teachers’ View Scale; Zoom.

Please Cite: Memiş, C. (2021). Elementary School Teachers’ Views Scale on the Using Zoom in Compulsory Distance Education During the Pandemic: Psychometric Properties. The European Educational Researcher, 4(2), 267-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.428

References

Bakioğlu, B., & Çevik, M. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemisi Sürecinde Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin Uzaktan Eğitime İlişkin Görüşleri [Science Teachers’ Views on Distance Education in the COVID-19 Pandemic Process]. Journal of Turkish Studies, 15(Issue 4), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.7827/turkishstudies.43502

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

Becta. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1603/1/becta_2004_barrierstouptake_litrev.pdf

Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Alvarez, A. V, Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Coëtlogon, P. De, Shahadu, S., Brown, M., … Mano, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic : Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. 15(1), 1–126.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (1994). Educational research methodology. Athens: Metaixmio.

Demir, S. (2011). Two inseparable facets of technology integration programs: Technology and theoretical framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75182

Deng, M., Wang, S., Guan, W., & Wang, Y. (2017). The development and initial validation of a questionnaire of inclusive teachers’ competency for meeting special educational needs in regular classrooms in China. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(4), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1197326

Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.5.2.155

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs : The Final Frontier in Our Quest for Technology Integration ? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683

Ghahramanian, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017

Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (Seventh ed). Pearson Education, Inc.

Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694

Kline, T. J. B. (2005). Psychological Testing Apractical Approach to Design and Evaluation. Sage publications.

Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating Synchronous Online Language Learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, August. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235

Kovacic, D. (2018). Using the Content Validity Index to Determine Content Validity of an Instrument Assessing Health Care Providers’ General Knowledge of Human Trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 4(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2017.1364905

Lapada, A. A., Miguel, F. F., Robledo, D. A. R., & Alam, Z. F. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 Awareness, Distance Learning Education Experiences and Perceptions towards Institutional Readiness and Challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.8

Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712

Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2020). College Student Transition to Synchronous Virtual Classes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Northeastern United States. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0078. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8485

Nicola, M., Alsafi, Z., Sohrabi, C., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C., Agha, M., & Agha, R. (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78(January), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018

Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8

Phan, T. T. N., & Dang, L. T. T. (2017). Teacher Readiness for Online Teaching: A Critical Review. Int. J. Open Distance E-Learn. IJODeL, 3(1), 1–16. http://ijodel.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/001_Phan_Dang.pdf

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199

Radwan, A., & Radwan, E. (2020). Social and Economic Impact of School Closure during the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quick Online Survey in the Gaza Strip. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0068. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8254

Sherry, L., & Gibson, D. (2002). The path to teacher leadership. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(2), 178–203. http://www.citejournal.org/vol2/iss2/general/article2.cfm

Spathis, P., & Dey, R. (2020). What Is Zoom Not Telling You : Lessons From an Online Course During COVID-19. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02936885

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi ((Version 1.6)). https://www.jamovi.org/

Tsarapkina, J. M., Anisimova, A. V., Grigoriev, S. G., Alekhina, A. A., & Mironov, A. G. (2020). Application of Zoom and Mirapolis Virtual Room in the context of distance learning for students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012094

Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807

Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 8(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.8.3.93

Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6


				
		
Vol. 4 Iss. 2

A Novel Approach to Integrated Science Teaching and Learning in a Selected Ghanaian Junior High School

The study was about a novel approach to Integrated Science teaching and learning in a selected Ghanaian junior high school. In this study, the approach to teaching and learning Integrated Science has been made entirely new and meaningful in the sense that the four learning behaviours (acquisition of knowledge, comprehension, application of knowledge and experimental skills) which constitute profile dimensions were incorporated into the objective-stating, lesson-delivery and assessment of lessons. The researcher made use of profile dimensions in preparing lesson plans, taught students with the new strategy and assessed the impact of the new approach on students in terms of teaching and learning of science. The students were highly interested in answering low order question. About 80% of the questions were high order questions which were poorly answered. They actually showed very little interest in answering high order questions. However, as the weeks went by and the approach to teaching the new strategy was improved, students’ interests were aroused and sustained leading to students demonstrating high ability to answer high order questions conveniently. By the end of the study, the students were able to set up and conduct experiments, observe the outcome and draw their own conclusions. The students could classify items based on their characteristics and discuss issues (like balanced diet) and outline the effect of malnutrition in animals. Students’ scientific drawings were neater and clearer with less woolen lines. The implication of the finding is that, with these learning behaviours and skills, students could do analytical thinking and have the capacity to apply their knowledge to problems and issues.

Download: EUERV3 3 6 KLUTSE
Download: 60, size: 0, date: 15.Feb.2021
Vol. 4 Iss. 1

School Principals’ Levels of Administrative Competences based on the Perceptions of Principals and Teachers

Abstract: This study aims to determine school principals’ level of administrative competencies according to the perceptions of teachers and principals. The study group consists of 134 teachers and 35 principals. The data of the research, which was designed in the survey model, were collected with the “School Administrators’ Competences Inventory”. The results revealed that school principals and teachers exhibited high levels of administrative Competencies as expected from the school principals. The opinions of the teachers and principals did not differ significantly in thecomparisons according to gender, seniority, school type, and duties (teacher vs. principal). Likewise, the correlation coefficients between the administrativecompetence subscales were estimated above a moderate level. As a result of the research, it can be said that teachers and principals have positive views about the competencies of the school administrators. However, though the Ministry of National Education and the academic community put great emphasis on it and a significant deal of knowledge and database has been accumulated about it, it is an important problem that school administration has not been defined as a profession in Turkey and no sustainable policy in this aspect has been developed yet.

Download: EUER10 11 20 MENTESE
Download: 35, size: 0, date: 15.Feb.2021
Vol. 4 Iss. 1

Is Personality Related to Risks Associated with Smartphones?

This is a preliminary study investigating the risks associated with smartphone addiction by personality and type of phone. The results relate to personal background, personality, smartphone usage, smartphone satisfaction, level of exposure to risks, and correlations between the variables. A significant but partial correlation was found between personality and smartphone addiction, satisfaction, and level of risk. Smartphone addiction was found to be positively correlated with extraversion (r = .21, p < .01). Satisfaction was found to be correlated positively with extraversion (r = .28, p < .01), agreeableness (r = .41,p < .01), and conscientiousness (r = .38, p < .01), and negatively with emotional stability (r = -.57, p < .01). Risk was found to be negatively correlated with agreeableness (r = -.17, p < .05). Differences between types of phone in satisfaction, risk, and smartphone addiction were examined. A significant correlation (F(4, 145) = 2.96, p < .05) was found in the level of smartphone addiction, but no differences were found in smartphone satisfaction or the level of risk associated with smartphones (F(4, 145) = 2.96, p > .05 and F(4, 145)= .45, p > .05, respectively). According to the results, it seems that personality greatly affects phone usage and exposure to risks, regardless of the type of phone, and that reducing smartphone usage may be beneficial. However, further research using larger study samples is needed to confirm this.

Download: EUER20 10 09 YAVICH
Download: 36, size: 0, date: 15.Feb.2021
Vol. 4 Iss. 1

The Role of the Capstone Project in Engineering Education in the Age of Industry 4.0 -A Case Study

Abstract: The capstone project in many academic institutions is the high point of undergraduate studies in engineering. The transition of graduates to industry is still not optimal, and there is a disparity between the needs of industry and the actual ability of academia to meet these needs. This study examines the role of the capstone project as a pedagogical tool in the age of Industry 4.0 in the field of product development, and as a bridge between academia and industry. The study combines qualitative and quantitative methods, focusing on four stakeholders (academia, industry, students and advisors). The study is based on several sources, such as: semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, observations, and more. The study results indicate that the capstone project is important and valuable for industry and academia, as well as being perceived by students as the most important undergraduate course. Nevertheless, the results reveal that it has many gaps and shortcomings and illuminate the need for a deep perceptual and structural change. Academia should reconsider projects’ length and define milestones in which independent learning is optimally enabled. The projects’ contribution to academic institution reputation, should be considered when defining the project goals. Coping with the challenges and gaps found in this study, the project can also be used in order to reduce incongruities, while preparing the students in a better way for their professional role in changing environment.

Download: EUER27 10 20 SHURIN
Download: 29, size: 0, date: 15.Feb.2021
Vol. 4 Iss. 1

Children’s Interactions in Ability-based Groups in a Primary Classroom

Abstract: The article reports data from an aspect of the study which aimed to study the nature of children’s interactions and their perceptions of ability-based groups in a primary classroom in England. Previous studies on ability-based group have mainly used quantitative research designs to study children’s interactions and appeared to award less opportunities to children to talk about their experiences of working in ability-based groups. This study has used a qualitative ethnographic research design to study children’s interactions and their perceptions of working in ability-based groups. Children’s interactions were studied using participant observations and debriefing activities were used to elicit children’s perspectives on their recorded interactions. Furthermore, informal conversational interviews were also used to hear children’s perspectives on their experiences of working in ability-based groups. The article only focuses on data related to children’s interactions, which revealed that children appeared to be cooperative, non-cooperative and competitive towards their peers in ability-based groups. We noted that children interpreted the group structure and learning task distinctively when deciding whether or not to work with others in groups. In some cases, children exhibited gender-biased attitudes while interacting with their peers. Children showed cooperative attitudes towards same-sex peers and non-cooperative attitudes towards other-sex peers. The findings highlight the importance of fully understanding children’s contexts and their dynamic influences on children’s interactions during their routinely organised ability-based group work. These also highlight the importance of listening to children’s perspectives while studying their interactions in ability groups in the mainstream primary classrooms.

Download: EUER 11 12 20 AMBREEN
Download: 38, size: 0, date: 15.Feb.2021
Vol. 4 Iss. 1

The Effect of Research-Inquiry Based Activities on the Academic Achievement, Attitudes, and Scientific Process Skills of Students in the Seventh Year Science Course

Abstract: This quasi-experimental study investigated the effect of research-inquiry based teaching strategies on students’ academic achievements(AA), attitudes, and scientific process skills(SPS). The study sample comprised50 students studying in Grade7in a secondary school affiliated with the Ministry of Education (MoE) in Bartın. In this study, experiment and control groups were selected to determine the effect of research-inquiry based teaching strategies. A draft teaching program for the “Reflection and Light Absorption in Mirrors” topic was conducted for three weeks with the experimental group in accordance with the research-inquiry based teaching philosophy and in compliance with the achievements included in the MoE curriculum. In the control group, the regular Classroom Science Course Curriculum was followed. SPSTest, AATest, and Attitude Scale were employed for the pre and post-tests of the experimental and control groups. The test results were analyzed using quantitative analysis methods. The use of research-inquiry based strategies in science courses in research was thus found to have a positive impact on students’ AA, attitudes, and SPS.

Download: EUER 25 09 20 TEKIN
Download: 47, size: 0, date: 10.Feb.2021
Vol. 4 Iss. 1

The Effect of Pressure Groups and the Moral Intensity on School Administrators’ Unethical Behavior: An Evaluation According to Teachers’ Opinions

In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of pressure groups and moral intensity on school administrators’ unethical behaviors according to teachers’ opinions. The study group of the research, which is causal comparative research, consists of 313 teachers. The research data have been collected by adapting the Openness to Violation of Ethical Decision (OVED) scale. In the research, descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA with repeated measures and two-way ANOVA for factorial design have been applied. In the research, it has been found out that the school administrators’ possibility of behaving unethically varies according to the moral intensity and pressure groups. As the moral intensity decreases, it can be stated that the school administrators’ possibility of behaving unethically increases when the demand comes from bureaucratic and political pressure groups. The school administrators’ possibility of performing an unethical act with both low and high moral intensity shows a meaningful difference according to the pressure group and the level of relationship between the teacher and the administrator. School administrators’ possibility of performing an unethical act with high moral intensity shows a meaningful difference according to teacher’s gender. At the end of the study,some suggestions have been made by considering the limitations and results of the research.

Download: EUERV3 3 8 ONDER
Download: 123, size: 0, date: 15.Oct.2020
Vol. 3 Iss. 3