The European Educational Researcher

Moving Beyond Practical Wisdom: Teacher Research in Secondary Education

The European Educational Researcher, Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2024, pp. 1-20
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 497 DOWNLOADS: 252 Publication date: 15 Jun 2024
ABSTRACT
Teaching in secondary education is mostly grounded in the practical wisdom of teachers. In general, teachers have limited knowledge of, access to, and interest in insights from scholarly work. Teacher research might be a way to move beyond practical wisdom as the only basis for good teaching. This study aimed to explore whether teacher research can encourage teachers’ learning process as professionals, improve teaching practices, and generate knowledge about these practices. Participants were 44 experienced secondary school teachers in the Netherlands following a 2-year Master of Science professional development program on teaching and learning. Data was gathered using questionnaires, learner reports, a group interview, and participants’ master theses. Data analyses showed that the teachers report significant changes in the way they teach and think about teaching: on the one hand, they reported being more focused on what they want to change in their teaching, but on the other hand, they mentioned that they take different perspectives when they are confronted with problems in teaching. In addition, they mentioned challenges that are common for starting researchers such as how to formulate a researchable question, how to select relevant literature, how to deal with peer review, and how to perform situated generalization. We discuss what kind of educational research is valuable for teachers as learning professionals in secondary schools.
KEYWORDS
Teacher Research, Secondary Education, Teaching and Learning
CITATION (APA)
Admiraal, W. F. (2024). Moving Beyond Practical Wisdom: Teacher Research in Secondary Education. The European Educational Researcher, 7(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.721
REFERENCES
  1. Admiraal, W. (2013). Academisch docentschap. Naar wetenschappelijk praktijkonderzoek door docenten [Scholarship of Teaching. Towards academic practice-based research by teachers]. Inaugural lecture. Leiden University, the Netherlands.
  2. Admiraal, W., Smit, B., & Zwart, R. (2014). Models and design principles for teacher research. IB Journal of Teaching Practice, 2(1), 1-6.
  3. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813.
  4. Argyris, C. (1993). On organizational learning. Blackwell Publishers.
  5. Bausmith, J., & Barry, C. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 40(4), 175-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11409927.
  6. Berry, A., & Kitchen, J. (2020). The role of Self-study in times of radical change. Studying Teacher Education, 16(2), 123-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1777763.
  7. Beycioglu, K., Ozer, N., & Ugurlu, C. T. (2010). Teachers' views on educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1088 - 1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.004.
  8. Broekkamp, H., & Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. van. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 303-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626127.
  9. Cardoso, L., Da Ponte, J. P., & Quaresma, M. (2023). The development of pedagogical content knowledge of prospective primary teachers in a lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 12(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2022-0027.
  10. Carr, W. (2007). Educational research as a practical science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30(3), 271-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701614774.
  11. Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 520-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408500710.
  12. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside-outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.
  13. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
  14. Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750.
  15. Curry, M. W. (2008). Critical friends groups: The possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform. Teachers College Record, 110(4), 733-774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000401.
  16. Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in Book Clubs and Reading Groups (2nd ed). Stenhouse.
  17. Davis, M., Kiely, R., & Askham, J. (2009). InSITEs into practitioner research: findings from a research-based ESOL teacher professional development programme. Studies in the Education of Adults, 41(2), 118-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2009.11661577.
  18. De Groot, A.D. (1980). Learner Reports as a tool in the evaluation of psychotherapy. In W. de Moor & H.R. Wijngaarden (Eds.), Psychotherapy, research and training (pp. 177-182). Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.
  19. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Aken, J. E. van. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020.
  20. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Routledge.
  21. Fox, A., & Poultney, V. (2020). Teacher professional learning through lesson study: teachers' reflections. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(4), 397-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2020-0011.
  22. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
  23. Godbold, N., Matthews, K. E. E., Gannaway, D. (2023). Theorising new possibilities for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and teaching-focused academics. Higher Education Research & Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2218809.
  24. Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [RE]Visioning the academic–teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching, 10, 35 – 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600320000170918.
  25. Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (1998). Conclusion: The value and promise of self-study. In M.L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 235–246). Falmer Press.
  26. Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 169-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445637.
  27. Imants, J., & Van der Wal, M. M. (2020). A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1604809.
  28. Ion, G., Stîngu, M., & Marin, E. (2019) How can researchers facilitate the utilisation of research by policy-makers and practitioners in education? Research Papers in Education, 34(4), 483-498, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452965.
  29. Jones, L. (2023). The ‘Teacher Research Group’ as a collaborative model of professional learning. Educational Action Research, 31(3), 409-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1960577.
  30. Juuti, K., Lavonen,J., Salonen, V., Salmela-Aro, K., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2021). A teacher–researcher partnership for professional learning: Co-designing project-based learning units to increase student engagement in science classes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 625-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1872207.
  31. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001003.
  32. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1) ,115 - 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_6.
  33. Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903093284.
  34. Kemmis, S. (2010). What is to be done? The place of action research. Educational Action Research, 18(4), 417-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2010.524745.
  35. Kreber, C. (2006). Developing the scholarship of teaching through transformative learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 88-109.
  36. Kyza, E. A., & Agesilaou, A. (2022). Investigating the processes of teacher and researcher empowerment and learning in co-design settings. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 100-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010213.
  37. LaBoskey, V. L. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V.K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  38. Lederman, L. C. (1990). Assessing educational effectiveness: The focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Communication Education, 39(2), 117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378794.
  39. Leuverink, K. R., & Aarts, A. M. L. (2022) Changes in teachers’ professional behavior through conducting teacher research. Journal of Educational Change, 23(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09409-9.
  40. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? A case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003.
  41. McGann, M., Ryan, M., McMahon, J., & Hall, T. (2020). T-REX: The Teachers’ Research Exchange. Overcoming the research-practice gap in education. TechTrends, 64, 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00486-4.
  42. McGeown, S. (2023). Research–practice partnerships in education: Why we need a methodological shift in how we do research. Psychology of Education Review, 47(1), 6-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2023.47.1.6.
  43. Mearns, T. L. (2012). Using CLIL to enhance pupils’ experience of learning and raise attainment in German and health education: a teacher research project. Language Learning Journal, 40(2), 175-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.621212.
  44. Mertler, C. A. (2021) Action Research as teacher Inquiry: A viable strategy for resolving problems of practice. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 26, Article 19. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol26/iss1/19.
  45. Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (2004). Reflective practice for educators. Corwin Press.
  46. Pithouse, K., Mitchell, C., & Weber, S. (2009). Self-study in teaching and teacher development: a call to action. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 43-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667444.
  47. Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Revisiting scholarship: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching (pp. 57-69). New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No. 86. Jossey-Bass.
  48. Schenke, W. (2015). Connecting practice-based research and school development. Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  49. Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. (2010). Practical wisdom: The right way to do the right thing. Penguin Group.
  50. Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2022): Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships – a systematic literature review. Educational Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2023103.
  51. Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172.
  52. Somekh, B., & K. Zeichner (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667402.
  53. Stapleton, S. R. (2021). Teacher participatory action research (TPAR): A methodological framework for political teacher research. Action Research, 19(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317751033.
  54. Swanborn, P. G. (1996). A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research. Quality & Quantity, 30, 19-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139833.
  55. Tan, W. K., Macdonald, D., & Rossi, T. (2009). Educational action research in Singapore: to prove or improve? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(3), 357-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790903100333.
  56. Tatto, M. T. (2021). Developing teachers’ research capacity: the essential role of teacher education. Teaching Education, 32(1), 27-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1860000.
  57. Thibodeau, G. M. (2008). A content literacy collaboration study group: High school teachers take charge of their professional learning. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(1), 54-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.1.6.
  58. Thomas, G. (2012). Changing our landscape of inquiry for a new science of education. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 26 – 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.1.6t2r089l715x3377.
  59. Tinoca, L., Piedade; J., Santos, S., Pedro, A., & Gomes, S. (2022). Design-based research in the educational field: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12(6), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060410.
  60. Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 155-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445628.
  61. Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299 -316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902919257.
  62. Van Katwijk, L., Jansen, E., Van Veen, K. (2023). Pre-service teacher research: a way to future-proof teachers? European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 435-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1928070.
  63. Van Kesteren, B. J. (1993). Applications of De Groot’s ¨learner report¨: A tool to identify educational objectives and learning experiences. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19(1), 65-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80057-4.
  64. Vermunt, J. D., Vrikki, M., Dudley, P., & Warwick, P. (2023). Relations between teacher learning patterns, personal and contextual factors, and learning outcomes in the context of Lesson Study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, 104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104295.
  65. Vrijnsen-de Corte, M. C. W., Brok, P. J. den, Kamp, M. J., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2013). Measuring teachers’ and student teachers’ perceptions of practice-based research in PDS and non-PDS settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 178 – 188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.006.
  66. Weimer, M. (2001). Learning more from the wisdom of practice. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Revisiting scholarship: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching (pp. 45-56). New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No. 86. Jossey-Bass.
  67. Weimer, M. (2008). Positioning scholarly work on teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020104.
  68. Weston, C., & McAlpine, L. (2001). Making explicit the development towards the scholarship of teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Revisiting scholarship: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching (pp. 89-99). New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No. 86. Jossey-Bass.
  69. Zwart, R., Smit, B., & Admiraal, W. (2015). Docentonderzoek nader bekeken: een reviewstudie naar de aard en betekenis van onderzoek door docenten [A closer look at teacher research: a review study into the nature and value of research conducted by teachers] Pedagogische Studiën, 92(2), 131 - 148.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License