The European Educational Researcher

Teachers’ Attitudes to Use of Advanced Technological Tools as Teaching and Learning Aids: From an Inter-Generational Perspective

Roman Yavich 1 * ,
Nitza Davidovitch 1
1 Ariel University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
The European Educational Researcher, Volume 4, Issue 3, October 2021, pp. 329-354
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 1011 DOWNLOADS: 762 Publication date: 15 Nov 2021
ABSTRACT
This study examines the perceptions and attitudes of teachers towards tablets as pedagogical aids from an intergenerational perspective. It is based on sociological theories and definitions that emphasize the disparities and the uniqueness of each “generation” as well as customary teaching and learning methods. The study compares teachers from Generation Y and Generation X and it was carried out about one year from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, when all teachers regardless of “generation” were required to teach digitally. We focused on a common digital tool, the tablet, which enables diverse learning methods. A questionnaire was administered to teachers in the Israeli educational system (N = 154). The research findings showed that teachers from Generation Y (aged 26-42) have more positive general attitudes towards the use of tablets as an integral part of the study program and identify more advantages and less disadvantages than their Generation X colleagues (ages 43-65). The current research findings were compatible with research findings regarding the general attitudes of teachers towards innovative technologies and their integration in study programs in educational systems worldwide. The practical meaning of the study is that it is important to continue leading programs for integrating advanced technological appliances, and not only tablets, in the curriculum, as the generation of teachers who will be responsible for educating the younger generations and for leading these programs in particular is from the age group that has the most positive attitudes towards the subject
KEYWORDS
Educational System, Generation X, Generation Y, “Smart” Cellular Technology, Use of Tablets, Teacher Attitudes.
CITATION (APA)
Yavich, R., & Davidovitch, N. (2021). Teachers’ Attitudes to Use of Advanced Technological Tools as Teaching and Learning Aids: From an Inter-Generational Perspective. The European Educational Researcher, 4(3), 329-354. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.434
REFERENCES
  1. Albert, M., Hurrelmann, K., Leven, I., Quenzel, G., & Schneekloth, U. (2019). The utility of the term ‘generation’ in sociology and youth research: A reply to Martin Schroder's thesis on the "Generation Myth". Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 71(3), 457-469.
  2. Almog, T. & Almog, O. (2016). Generation Y – as if there is no tomorrow.
  3. Richard Anderson, Ruth Anderson, Beth Simon, Steven A. Wolfman, Tammy VanDeGrift, and Ken Yasuhara. 2004.
  4. Experiences with a Tablet PC Based Lecture Presentation System in Computer Science Courses. In
  5. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 56–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/971300.971323
  6. Business as unusual: How COVID-19 could change the future of work, UN News, May 27, 2020, https://news. un.org/en/story/2020/05/1064802 [accessed June 2020].
  7. Chai, S. & Lukash, A. (2016, August 31). Beginning the year with the new teachers: Women have an absolute majority. Ynet. https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4848298,00.html [Hebrew]
  8. Chien, S.E., Chu, L., Lee, H.H., Yang, C.C., Lin, F.H., Yang, P.L., ... & Yeh, S.L. (2019). Age difference in perceived ease of use, curiosity, and implicit negative attitude toward robots. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 8(2), 1-19.
  9. Churchill, D., Fox, B., & King, M. (2012). Study of affordances of iPads and teachers' private theories. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2(3), 251-254.
  10. Clark, B. (2019). Fourth turning clash of inter-civilization cultures (Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University).
  11. Connolly, S.L., Miller, C.J., Koenig, C.J., Zamora, K.A., Wright, P.B., Stanley, R.L., & Pyne, J.M. (2018). Veterans’ attitudes toward smartphone App use for mental health care: Qualitative study of rurality and age differences. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(8), e10748.
  12. Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2015). Technology-related involvement: The effect of the MASHOV system on parent involvement in Israeli junior highs. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 11(4), 243-252.
  13. Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2018). The impact of mobile tablet use on students' perception of learning processes. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(1), 29.
  14. Davidovitch, N., & Wadmany, R. (2021). E-Learning in times of crisis: An incidental or facilitative event? In Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science in Higher Education (pp. 453-479). Springer, Cham.
  15. Fernández-López, Á., Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M.J., Rodríguez-Almendros, M.L., & Martínez-Segura, M.J. (2013). Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers & Education, 61, 77-90.
  16. Garcia Perez, A., Gil Mediavilla, M., Álvarez, I. & Casares, M. (2020). The influence of social networks within educational and social fields: A comparative study between two generations of online students. Sustainability, 12, 9941. 10.3390/su12239941
  17. Joordens, M. (2020). Teaching with a tablet PC. In: Mobile devices in education: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 721-736).
  18. Karsenti, T., & Fievez, A. (2013). The iPad in education: Uses, benefits, and challenges – A survey of 6,057 students and 302 teachers in Quebec, Canada. CRIFPE.
  19. Larrington, C. (2017). Family and friends: Generation in medieval romance. Medium Aevum, 86(2), 375-376.
  20. Lee, C. C., Czaja, S. J., Moxley, J. H., Sharit, J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., & Rogers, W.A. (2019). Attitudes toward computers across adulthood from 1994 to 2013. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 22-33.
  21. Liberman, O., Gal, N. & Amzalag, M. (2019). Attitudes of special education teachers toward the integration of ipads in teaching pupils of the autistic spectrum. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, I. Blau, A. Caspi, N. Geri, Y. Kalman & S. Etgar (Eds.), Learning in the technological era XIV: Proceedings of the 14th Chais Conference for the study of innovation and learning technologies (pp. 149-154). The Open University. [Hebrew]
  22. Little, B., & Winch, A. (2017). Generation: The politics of patriarchy and social change. Soundings, 66(16), 129-144.
  23. Lorah, E. R., Parnell, A., Whitby, P. S., & Hantula, D. (2015). A systematic review of tablet computers and portable media players as speech generating devices for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3792-3804.
  24. Manny-Ikan, E., Berger-Tikochinski, T., & Bashan, Z. (2015). The tablet project of “Kadima Mada” in a Jerusalemregion school, 2014/15. Henrietta Szold Institute. [Hebrew]
  25. Manny-Ikan, E., Berger Tikochinski, T., Bashan, Z. & Wolf, I. (2015). Using tablets in the classroom – Implications for teaching and learning. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, I. Blau, A. Caspi, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, & V. Silber-Varod, Learning in the technological era: Proceedings of the 10th Chais Conference for the Study of Innovation and Learning Technologies. The Open University. [Hebrew]
  26. McCrindle, M. & Fell, A. (2020). Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on the emerging generations.
  27. Meishar-Tal, H., Shonfeld, M. & Ran, H. (2016). Students’ writing and reading preferences in a “paperless” classroom. In Y. Eshet-Alkalay, I. Blau, A. Caspi, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, & V. Silber-Varod (Eds.), Learning in the technological era XI: Proceedings of the 11th Chais Conference for the Study of Innovation and learning Technologies. The Open University. [Hebrew]
  28. Perloff, R. M. (2017). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. In The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315657714
  29. Reisenwitz, T.H., & Fowler, J.G. (2019). Information sources and the tourism decision-making process: An examination of Generation X and Generation Y consumers. Global Business Review, 20(6), 1372-1392.
  30. Salant, A. (2013). Tablets in the schools – state of affairs, April 2013. Knowledge and digital inquisitiveness. http://amisalant.com/?p=4890 [Hebrew]
  31. Seifert, A., Reinwand, D.A., & Schlomann, A. (2019). Designing and using digital mental health interventions for older adults: Being aware of digital inequality. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 568. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00568
  32. Shepherd, I.J., & Reeves, B. (2011). iPad or iFad – The reality of a paperless classroom. Mobility Conference. Abilene Christian University.
  33. Ting, H., Lim, T.Y., de Run, E.C., Koh, H., & Sahdan, M. (2018). Are we baby boomers, gen X and gen Y? A qualitative inquiry into generation cohorts in Malaysia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 109-115.
  34. UNESCO (2020). With over 63 million teachers impacted by the COVID-19 crisis, on World Teachers' Day, UNESCO urges increased investment in teachers for Learning Recovery. https://en.unesco.org/news/over63-million-teachers-impacted-covid-19-crisis-world-teachers-day-unesco-urges-increased, May 2020.
  35. Zilka, C.G. (2011). Digital environment in kindergartens. In D. Chen & G. Kurtz (Eds.), ICT, learning and teaching (pp. 207-230). The Center for Academic Studies. [Hebrew]
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.