The European Educational Researcher

Trust BUT VERIFY: Maintaining Research Integrity in the 21st Century

Scott W Brown 1 *
1 University of Connecticut* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
The European Educational Researcher, Volume 6, Issue 3, October 2023, pp. 71-77
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 705 DOWNLOADS: 336 Publication date: 15 Oct 2023
ABSTRACT
Research misconduct erodes the trust of the stake holders in the social science research enterprise. In order to return confidence and trust in social science research findings, we must emphasize research integrity through education and transparency. This essay discusses three fundamental components of research misconduct to raise awareness of examples of fabrication and falsification misconduct by several prominent social science researchers.
KEYWORDS
Research Ethics, Research Misconduct, Research Integrity.
CITATION (APA)
Brown, S. W. (2023). Trust BUT VERIFY: Maintaining Research Integrity in the 21st Century. The European Educational Researcher, 6(3), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.631
REFERENCES
  1. Artino, A.R., Jr. & Brown, S.W. (2009). Ethics in educational research: A comparative analysis of graduate student and faculty beliefs. College Student Journal, 43(2), 599-615.
  2. Christensen Hughes, J., Eaton, S. (2022). Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: Beyond Student Cheating. In Eaton, S.E., Christensen Hughes, J. (Eds) Academic Integrity in Canada. Ethics and Integrity in Educational Contexts, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_4 .
  3. Enserink, M. (2012, November 28). Final Report: Stapel Affair Points to Bigger Problems in Social Psychology. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/final-report-stapel-affair-points-bigger-problems-social-psychology .
  4. Hamblin, J. (2018, September 24). A Credibility Crisis in Food Science. The fall of a prominent behavioral scientist tells of a system where research is judged not on merit, but on the attention it gets. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/09/what-is-food-science/571105/
  5. Jindra, M. & Sakamoto, A., (2023). When Ideology Drives Social Science: Statistical malfeasance and cherry-picking are rife. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 6, 2023. https://www.chronicle.com/article/when-ideology-drives-social-science?sra=true&cid=gen_sign_in.
  6. Martinson, B., Anderson, M. & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–738 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a
  7. Smith, G. (2023, June 6). How Shoddy Data Becomes Sensational Research. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/how-shoddy-data-becomes-sensational-research.
  8. Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research.US Department of Health and Human Services. https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/rcrintro.pdf .
  9. Wade, N. (2010, August 20). Harvard Finds Scientist Guilty of Misconduct. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/21/education/21harvard.html.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.